<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clone VMWare Fusion Virtual Machines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines</link>
	<description>Cameraman and website designer from Milton Keynes (Buckinghamshire)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tremblett</title>
		<link>http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tremblett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/?p=944#comment-240</guid>
		<description>I have used your procedure in the past with great success. When I try it now using the latest version of VMF, it seems that the eth0 network interface (Ubuntu VM) disappears in the clone. I have tried using the advanced options to generate a new MAC for the clone but with no luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used your procedure in the past with great success. When I try it now using the latest version of VMF, it seems that the eth0 network interface (Ubuntu VM) disappears in the clone. I have tried using the advanced options to generate a new MAC for the clone but with no luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tremblett</title>
		<link>http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tremblett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/?p=944#comment-245</guid>
		<description>I have used your procedure in the past with great success. When I try it now using the latest version of VMF, it seems that the eth0 network interface (Ubuntu VM) disappears in the clone. I have tried using the advanced options to generate a new MAC for the clone but with no luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used your procedure in the past with great success. When I try it now using the latest version of VMF, it seems that the eth0 network interface (Ubuntu VM) disappears in the clone. I have tried using the advanced options to generate a new MAC for the clone but with no luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/?p=944#comment-239</guid>
		<description>@Eric - If you choose &quot;moved&quot; when moving the vm to a new host, it *may* be fine.  For the copied option, vmware products change the MAC address of the vm to avoid collisions, which is one of the things WinLicensing looks at. (Note: have not yet tested.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eric &#8211; If you choose &#8220;moved&#8221; when moving the vm to a new host, it *may* be fine.  For the copied option, vmware products change the MAC address of the vm to avoid collisions, which is one of the things WinLicensing looks at. (Note: have not yet tested.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/?p=944#comment-244</guid>
		<description>@Eric - If you choose &quot;moved&quot; when moving the vm to a new host, it *may* be fine.  For the copied option, vmware products change the MAC address of the vm to avoid collisions, which is one of the things WinLicensing looks at. (Note: have not yet tested.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eric &#8211; If you choose &#8220;moved&#8221; when moving the vm to a new host, it *may* be fine.  For the copied option, vmware products change the MAC address of the vm to avoid collisions, which is one of the things WinLicensing looks at. (Note: have not yet tested.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Novikoff</title>
		<link>http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Novikoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 00:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/?p=944#comment-238</guid>
		<description>I have done this copy/clone operation but moved the clone to my laptop.  All was well for a while, then Win7 complained that the hardware had changed, and stopped working without a new license.  I&#039;m fine with getting another license, but the problem is that i want to only maintain one windows environment with all of its installed applications, settings, etc.   By having to relicense Windows, I am changing the copy, which means that I can no longer maintain just one VM image.   Is there any way around this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have done this copy/clone operation but moved the clone to my laptop.  All was well for a while, then Win7 complained that the hardware had changed, and stopped working without a new license.  I&#8217;m fine with getting another license, but the problem is that i want to only maintain one windows environment with all of its installed applications, settings, etc.   By having to relicense Windows, I am changing the copy, which means that I can no longer maintain just one VM image.   Is there any way around this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Novikoff</title>
		<link>http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Novikoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/?p=944#comment-243</guid>
		<description>I have done this copy/clone operation but moved the clone to my laptop.  All was well for a while, then Win7 complained that the hardware had changed, and stopped working without a new license.  I&#039;m fine with getting another license, but the problem is that i want to only maintain one windows environment with all of its installed applications, settings, etc.   By having to relicense Windows, I am changing the copy, which means that I can no longer maintain just one VM image.   Is there any way around this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have done this copy/clone operation but moved the clone to my laptop.  All was well for a while, then Win7 complained that the hardware had changed, and stopped working without a new license.  I&#8217;m fine with getting another license, but the problem is that i want to only maintain one windows environment with all of its installed applications, settings, etc.   By having to relicense Windows, I am changing the copy, which means that I can no longer maintain just one VM image.   Is there any way around this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/?p=944#comment-237</guid>
		<description>I would love to know as well. I had to delete all my snapshots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to know as well. I had to delete all my snapshots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/?p=944#comment-242</guid>
		<description>I would love to know as well. I had to delete all my snapshots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to know as well. I had to delete all my snapshots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk</title>
		<link>http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/?p=944#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Nice article, thanks for publishing it.  I have a question about snapshots: the same snapshots that were associated with the original are still associated with the clone, which is both a blessing and a curse.  Is there any way that you know of to disassociate the snapshots from the clone without deleting them from the original?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, thanks for publishing it.  I have a question about snapshots: the same snapshots that were associated with the original are still associated with the clone, which is both a blessing and a curse.  Is there any way that you know of to disassociate the snapshots from the clone without deleting them from the original?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk</title>
		<link>http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/how-to/clone-vmware-fusion-virtual-machines/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelsegebrecht.com/?p=944#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Nice article, thanks for publishing it.  I have a question about snapshots: the same snapshots that were associated with the original are still associated with the clone, which is both a blessing and a curse.  Is there any way that you know of to disassociate the snapshots from the clone without deleting them from the original?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, thanks for publishing it.  I have a question about snapshots: the same snapshots that were associated with the original are still associated with the clone, which is both a blessing and a curse.  Is there any way that you know of to disassociate the snapshots from the clone without deleting them from the original?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 471/479 objects using apc

Served from: www.axelsegebrecht.com @ 2012-02-10 18:27:46 -->
